How can those images be referenced properly in a wikipedia article without violating copyright and in order to comply with the "reliable sources" requirement?Ģ. There are many more images that have been presented to the public through their facebook page. People were begging for ways to contribute to find out what it is, so finally they conceded and decided to sell t-shirts because they didn't want donations.)ġ. There has been one article that was picked up by the mainstream media that has many facts incorrect, (for example, it makes them look like they are running a scam when, in fact, they have refused on many occasions offers for donations to fund their expeditions and refuse to take money from anybody. In addition, much of the information about their findings has only been posted to their facebook page. Unfortunately, many of the images released to the public have been released on their open facebook page. I am simply trying to present some facts because I feel that the facts are not accurately presented on the current page. I really am not trying to be biased or promote them. I have been trying to revise the baltic anomaly wikipedia article. I'm sorry if this isn't the right way to "talk" but I'm not familiar with the function. Darwinerasmus ( talk) 02:38, 27 July 2012 (UTC) Reply Using the article as a promotional channel good job on cleaning it up - it looks a lot better and more balanced now. Darwinerasmus ( talk) 19:32, 26 July 2012 (UTC) Reply Re: the article serving as an "update on current findings/future plans of Ocean X", see WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTDIARY. Similarly i would see USO as the correct descriptive label for it. I think it's right to label it as a anomaly, rather than a UFO as there it is not encycloepedic to endorse a fringe opinion that it is a UFO. Ocean X are locked in a contract with titan television regarding their latest expeditions, so have only published nuggets of information on their own website and facebook group WP:ABOUTSELF as long as it does not unduly weight or bias the article WP:UNDUE.
BALTIC SEA ANOMALY WIKI UPDATE
I don't see the problem in using primary sources to document the anamolies descriptive charecteristics or update on current findings/future plans of Ocean X.
The recently-added Description section is original research culled from interviews cited to primary sources (Videos published by "Ocean X") and unreliable fringe sources (Clyde Lewis 21st century, Howard Hughes The Unexplained, etc.).
0 kommentar(er)
